Storyboard
16 scenes, 4:53 at 150 words per minute including pauses. Narration is copied from the script; every chart value and on-screen citation is checked against a passage.
1. sc01 · 0:00 to 0:12 typography
If the electricity that runs a heat pump comes from a gas or coal power plant, is the heat pump really any cleaner than the gas furnace it replaced?
Visual. The question types on, large and centred; "cleaner" turns green as the sentence ends.
On screen. Is a heat pump really cleaner than gas?
2. sc02 · 0:12 to 0:17 transition
It is a fair question, so let's put it to the studies.
Visual. Split field wipes the question away to an empty field ready for the first quote.
3. sc03 · 0:17 to 0:37 typography
The doubters are easy to find: one letter to the Boston Globe warned that "the majority of electricity in Massachusetts is sourced from gas- and coal-fired power plants", and the American Gas Association argues that a gas home can have a smaller carbon footprint than a heat pump home.
Visual. Quote card, text only; "gas- and coal-fired" holds and turns amber.
On screen. "the majority of electricity in Massachusetts is sourced from gas- and coal-fired power plants"
Cite. Letter to the Boston GlobeAmerican Gas Association
4. sc04 · 0:37 to 0:49 typography
The channel Technology Connections answers that even with a gas-fired power plant behind it, "a heat pump can move more heat energy into a living space than the natural gas itself contains".
Visual. Quote card, text only, mirrored from the previous one; "more heat energy" turns green as it is spoken.
On screen. "a heat pump can move more heat energy into a living space than the natural gas itself contains"
Cite. Technology Connections, YouTube
5. sc05 · 0:49 to 0:54 typography
So which is it, in real homes, on real grids?
Visual. The question types on centred; "real grids" holds in amber.
On screen. Which is it, on real grids?
6. sc06 · 0:54 to 1:32 data-chart
Start in Britain, with households that replaced a gas boiler with a heat pump. A working paper turned the change in those households' energy use into emissions and found, in today's terms, a cut of 1.16 tonnes of CO2 equivalent per household per year: 36 percent of the footprint their energy use had before the heat pump. The authors also assume the electricity grid keeps getting cleaner, and on that assumption project a 68 percent cut across an assumed 20-year working life: a lifetime projection, not today's figure.
Visual. Two horizontal bars. The 36% bar grows on "36 percent" in solid green; the 68% bar grows on "68 percent" in a lighter hatched tone, labelled as a projection.
| Today | 36% | 36 | percent | Bernard 2024 (NBER), UK heat pumps and a time-of-use tariff, lines 193-L198 |
| Projected over 20-year life | 68% | 68 | percent | Bernard 2024 (NBER), UK heat pumps and a time-of-use tariff, lines 193-L198 |
Cite. NBER working paper, UK heat pump households
7. sc07 · 1:32 to 1:37 typography
But not every grid is Britain's. What happens where coal still runs the show?
Visual. The question types on; "coal" turns dark grey.
On screen. What happens where coal still runs the show?
8. sc08 · 1:37 to 2:07 document-excerpt
A report from RMI compared electric heating with gas in American cities on the grid of the time, and found it cut carbon in Oakland, Houston and Providence. But in Chicago, where coal is the power that answers extra demand most of the year, electrifying heat increased carbon emissions in the short term. RMI expected that to swing in favour of electrification, in Chicago and nationally, as coal plants keep retiring.
Visual. The RMI passage on a page; the city names read in order, then the Chicago line highlights in amber as s11 is spoken.
Cite. RMI, The Economics of Electrifying Buildings, 2018
9. sc09 · 2:07 to 2:32 typography
The Canadian Climate Institute, citing the International Energy Agency and a consulting firm, says that even on relatively emissions-intensive electricity, heat pumps emit 20 to 30 percent less carbon than gas furnaces, because they are so efficient. That is a summary of other work, not a measurement on any one grid, so it sits beside RMI's Chicago result rather than overturning it.
Visual. Title card; "20 to 30%" in green, large, "less carbon than gas furnaces" beneath.
On screen. 20 to 30% less carbon than gas furnaces
Cite. Canadian Climate Institute, 2023, citing IEA
10. sc10 · 2:32 to 2:37 typography
So how many American homes sit on the wrong side of that line?
Visual. The question types on centred.
On screen. How many homes sit on the wrong side?
11. sc11 · 2:37 to 2:58 data-chart
One national model found switching to a heat pump would raise CO2 emissions in just 2.1 percent of the US housing stock, a share of all houses rather than of gas homes alone, but that estimate assumes grid CO2 emissions fall 45 percent over the heat pump's 15-year life.
Visual. Three tiles in a row: 2.1% lands first on "2.1 percent"; 45% and 15 years land together on "45 percent", in amber as assumptions.
| Houses where emissions rise | 2.1% | 2.1 | percent | Deetjen 2021, private economics of US residential heat pumps, lines 635-L642 |
| Assumed fall in grid CO2 | 45% | 45 | percent | Deetjen 2021, private economics of US residential heat pumps, lines 635-L642 |
| Heat pump life | 15 years | 15 | count | Deetjen 2021, private economics of US residential heat pumps, lines 635-L642 |
Cite. Deetjen et al., 2021, US housing stock model
12. sc12 · 2:58 to 3:29 document-excerpt
A second national study, from US national laboratories, modelled every home switching to a heat pump at once, not only gas-heated ones, and found average greenhouse gas savings positive in every state, in every future grid scenario it modelled, even the most conservative one. Notice what that measures: an average for each state on grids the authors project into the future, not today's grid, and not a count of the homes that come out behind.
Visual. The passage on a page; the savings sentence highlights green on s25; on s26 "future grid" is underlined.
Cite. Wilson et al., 2024, US national laboratories
13. sc13 · 3:29 to 3:32 typography
The cleaner the grid, the bigger the gain.
Visual. Title card; "cleaner" and "bigger" in green.
On screen. The cleaner the grid, the bigger the gain
14. sc14 · 3:32 to 3:54 document-excerpt
In a Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory study of home retrofits, the group of projects built around electrification, with solar panels, sat mostly in states with low-carbon electricity, and there switching fuels sharply boosted their carbon savings. The authors expect similar projects to save less carbon in states whose electricity is more carbon-intensive.
Visual. The LBNL passage on a page; the fuel-switching line highlights green on s16.
Cite. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 2021, retrofit study
15. sc15 · 3:54 to 4:31 typography
So does swapping gas for a heat pump cut emissions on today's grid? In the British homes, yes, by about a third of their energy footprint, and in RMI's words it already cuts carbon on today's grid in all but the most coal-heavy systems, though that was the grid when RMI wrote it. The exception is a grid like Chicago's. How rare that exception is, the evidence can only estimate: the national American studies both build in a grid that gets cleaner, so neither is a reading of today's grid alone.
Visual. List builds one line per sentence: Britain in green, the Chicago exception in amber, the estimate caveat in grey.
On screen. British homes: about a third less / The exception: a grid like Chicago's / How rare: only estimated
Cite. NBER working paper, UK householdsRMI, 2018
16. sc16 · 4:31 to 4:53 typography
If carbon is why you are looking at a heat pump, the question to put to your power company is not whether it burns anything, but what it burns when demand rises, and whether that is changing. Know that, and you know the part of the answer these studies turn on.
Visual. The question types on centred; "when demand rises" in amber.
On screen. What does it burn when demand rises?