Skip to content
Commonwealth of Reason
conflict:heat-pumps-cut-home-carbon-emissions

Do Heat Pumps Cut Emissions on Today's Grid?

Every factual sentence carries assertions checked against the recorded evidence: references must resolve, figures and quotations must be in the cited passage, arithmetic must reproduce, and an independent reviewer must approve the wording. Automated validation says whether the narration is ready for human editorial review; it does not establish truth.

Validation
passed (revision 4)
Runtime
706 words, about 4.8 min at 150 wpm
Assertions
19 of 19 verified
Issues
0 blocking, 0 warnings
Storyboard
16 scenes, 4:53 (ok)
Model
claude-opus-5-5

Open a sentence to see its assertions, their status and the passages behind them. Sentences without a marker make no factual claim.

Hook

If the electricity that runs a heat pump comes from a gas or coal power plant, is the heat pump really any cleaner than the gas furnace it replaced? It is a fair question, so let's put it to the studies.

Setup

The doubters are easy to find: one letter to the Boston Globe warned that "the majority of electricity in Massachusetts is sourced from gas- and coal-fired power plants", and the American Gas Association argues that a gas home can have a smaller carbon footprint than a heat pump home. s03 verified

verified s03.a A letter to the Boston Globe warned that most Massachusetts electricity comes from gas- and coal-fired plants, and the American Gas Association argues that a natural gas home can have a lower carbon footprint than a heat pump home.

supported (approved): no direct support, 4 contradicting, 2 qualifying, 2 source statements.

info wording: Wording differs from the canonical claim; the reviewer confirms the passages entail it.

  • statement The advance of heat pumps bumps up against cost concerns - The Boston Globe the majority of electricity in Massachusetts is sourced from gas- and coal-fired power plants. Until we clean up the source of our electricity
  • statement Natural Gas or a Heat Pump? Where You Live Matters - American Gas Association a natural gas ENERGY STAR household can have a carbon footprint 19% lower than an ENERGY STAR heat pump household
The channel Technology Connections answers that even with a gas-fired power plant behind it, "a heat pump can move more heat energy into a living space than the natural gas itself contains". s04 verified

verified s04.a Technology Connections argues that even with a natural gas fired power plant, a heat pump can move more heat into a home than the gas itself contains.

supported (approved): no direct support, 2 qualifying, 1 source statement.

info wording: Wording differs from the canonical claim; the reviewer confirms the passages entail it.

  • statement Furnaces: Why we still burn fuel to heat our homes a heat pump can move more heat energy into a living space than the natural gas itself contains
So which is it, in real homes, on real grids?

Investigation

Start in Britain, with households that replaced a gas boiler with a heat pump.
A working paper turned the change in those households' energy use into emissions and found, in today's terms, a cut of 1.16 tonnes of CO2 equivalent per household per year: 36 percent of the footprint their energy use had before the heat pump. s07 verified

verified s07.a In today's terms, replacing a gas boiler with a heat pump is equivalent to a 1.16 tonne reduction in CO2eq emissions per household per year, a 36% reduction on the households' pre-heat-pump CO2eq footprint from annual energy consumption.

qualified (qualify): 1 supporting (1 independent, strongest 0.65), 2 qualifying.

warning needs-qualification: RMI 2018, the economics of electrifying buildings: On 2016 short-term marginal grid data, heat pumps cut emissions versus gas in Oakland, Houston and Providence but raised them in coal-heavy Chicago (about 50% more), so the claim holds on most grids but not all. Less 2021 (LBNL), cost of decarbonization retrofits: LBNL: fuel switching boosted carbon cuts (68% vs 50%) in the electrification cluster…

  • supports Bernard 2024 (NBER), UK heat pumps and a time-of-use tariff right 65%, direct Bernard 2024 (NBER), UK heat pumps and a time-of-use tariff, lines 193-L198today’s terms, that is equivalent to a 1.16 tonne reduction in CO2eq emissions per household per year – we calculate that this is a 36% reduction on their pre-heat-pump adoption CO2eq foot- print from annual energy consumption of 3.23 tonne…
The authors also assume the electricity grid keeps getting cleaner, and on that assumption project a 68 percent cut across an assumed 20-year working life: a lifetime projection, not today's figure. s08 verified

verified s08.a Assuming a 20-year heat pump lifespan and an electricity grid that decarbonizes, the authors estimate heat pumps can reduce a household's CO2 equivalent emissions by 68% throughout their operational lifespan.

qualified (qualify): 1 supporting (1 independent, strongest 0.65), 2 qualifying.

warning needs-qualification: RMI 2018, the economics of electrifying buildings: On 2016 short-term marginal grid data, heat pumps cut emissions versus gas in Oakland, Houston and Providence but raised them in coal-heavy Chicago (about 50% more), so the claim holds on most grids but not all. Less 2021 (LBNL), cost of decarbonization retrofits: LBNL: fuel switching boosted carbon cuts (68% vs 50%) in the electrification cluster…

  • supports Bernard 2024 (NBER), UK heat pumps and a time-of-use tariff right 65%, direct Bernard 2024 (NBER), UK heat pumps and a time-of-use tariff, lines 193-L198today’s terms, that is equivalent to a 1.16 tonne reduction in CO2eq emissions per household per year – we calculate that this is a 36% reduction on their pre-heat-pump adoption CO2eq foot- print from annual energy consumption of 3.23 tonne…
But not every grid is Britain's. What happens where coal still runs the show?
A report from RMI compared electric heating with gas in American cities on the grid of the time, and found it cut carbon in Oakland, Houston and Providence. s10 verified

verified s10.a RMI found that electrifying space and water heating reduced carbon compared with natural gas on the electric grid of the time in Oakland, Houston and Providence.

qualified (qualify): no direct support, 2 qualifying.

warning needs-qualification: RMI 2018, the economics of electrifying buildings: On 2016 short-term marginal grid data, heat pumps cut emissions versus gas in Oakland, Houston and Providence but raised them in coal-heavy Chicago (about 50% more), so the claim holds on most grids but not all. Add the qualification: the evidence supports a narrower or weaker statement.

  • qualifies RMI 2018, the economics of electrifying buildings partly 50%, direct RMI 2018, the economics of electrifying buildings, lines 225-L231Electrification already reduces carbon with today’s electric grid in all but the most coal-heavy systems. This is true in comparison to not only heating oil and propane, but also to natural gas. Figure 3 illustrates this result, showing emi…
But in Chicago, where coal is the power that answers extra demand most of the year, electrifying heat increased carbon emissions in the short term. s11 verified

verified s11.a Because the grid serving Chicago has coal as its marginal generator most of the year, RMI found the short-term impact of electrification there increases carbon emissions.

qualified (qualify): no direct support, 2 qualifying.

warning needs-qualification: RMI 2018, the economics of electrifying buildings: On 2016 short-term marginal grid data, heat pumps cut emissions versus gas in Oakland, Houston and Providence but raised them in coal-heavy Chicago (about 50% more), so the claim holds on most grids but not all. Add the qualification: the evidence supports a narrower or weaker statement.

  • qualifies RMI 2018, the economics of electrifying buildings partly 50%, direct RMI 2018, the economics of electrifying buildings, lines 225-L231Electrification already reduces carbon with today’s electric grid in all but the most coal-heavy systems. This is true in comparison to not only heating oil and propane, but also to natural gas. Figure 3 illustrates this result, showing emi…
RMI expected that to swing in favour of electrification, in Chicago and nationally, as coal plants keep retiring. s12 verified

verified s12.a RMI expects the long-term impact to swing in favor of electrification in Chicago and nationally with continued retirement of coal plants.

qualified (qualify): no direct support, 2 qualifying.

warning needs-qualification: RMI 2018, the economics of electrifying buildings: On 2016 short-term marginal grid data, heat pumps cut emissions versus gas in Oakland, Houston and Providence but raised them in coal-heavy Chicago (about 50% more), so the claim holds on most grids but not all. Add the qualification: the evidence supports a narrower or weaker statement.

  • qualifies RMI 2018, the economics of electrifying buildings partly 50%, direct RMI 2018, the economics of electrifying buildings, lines 225-L231Electrification already reduces carbon with today’s electric grid in all but the most coal-heavy systems. This is true in comparison to not only heating oil and propane, but also to natural gas. Figure 3 illustrates this result, showing emi…
The Canadian Climate Institute, citing the International Energy Agency and a consulting firm, says that even on relatively emissions-intensive electricity, heat pumps emit 20 to 30 percent less carbon than gas furnaces, because they are so efficient. s13 verified

verified s13.a Citing the International Energy Agency (2022) and a consultancy (2021), the Canadian Climate Institute says that even on relatively emissions-intensive electricity, heat pumps emit between 20 and 30 per cent less carbon than gas furnaces because of their high efficiency.

qualified (qualify): 1 supporting (1 independent, strongest 0.4), 2 qualifying.

warning needs-qualification: RMI 2018, the economics of electrifying buildings: On 2016 short-term marginal grid data, heat pumps cut emissions versus gas in Oakland, Houston and Providence but raised them in coal-heavy Chicago (about 50% more), so the claim holds on most grids but not all. Less 2021 (LBNL), cost of decarbonization retrofits: LBNL: fuel switching boosted carbon cuts (68% vs 50%) in the electrification cluster…

  • supports Canadian Climate Institute 2023, heat pumps pay off right 40%, direct Canadian Climate Institute 2023, heat pumps pay off, lines 459-L462towards zero as the grid gets cleaner. But even when running on relatively emissions‐intensive electricity, heat pumps emit between 20 and 30 per cent less carbon emissions than gas furnaces because of their high efficiency (International E…
That is a summary of other work, not a measurement on any one grid, so it sits beside RMI's Chicago result rather than overturning it. s14 verified

verified s14.a The Canadian Climate Institute's 20 to 30 per cent figure is cited from the International Energy Agency and a consultancy, not measured on a named grid.

qualified (qualify): 1 supporting (1 independent, strongest 0.4), 2 qualifying.

warning needs-qualification: RMI 2018, the economics of electrifying buildings: On 2016 short-term marginal grid data, heat pumps cut emissions versus gas in Oakland, Houston and Providence but raised them in coal-heavy Chicago (about 50% more), so the claim holds on most grids but not all. Less 2021 (LBNL), cost of decarbonization retrofits: LBNL: fuel switching boosted carbon cuts (68% vs 50%) in the electrification cluster…

  • supports Canadian Climate Institute 2023, heat pumps pay off right 40%, direct Canadian Climate Institute 2023, heat pumps pay off, lines 459-L462towards zero as the grid gets cleaner. But even when running on relatively emissions‐intensive electricity, heat pumps emit between 20 and 30 per cent less carbon emissions than gas furnaces because of their high efficiency (International E…
So how many American homes sit on the wrong side of that line?
One national model found switching to a heat pump would raise CO2 emissions in just 2.1 percent of the US housing stock, a share of all houses rather than of gas homes alone, but that estimate assumes grid CO2 emissions fall 45 percent over the heat pump's 15-year life. s24 verified

verified s24.a Deetjen et al. estimate heat pump adoption increases CO2 emissions in only 2.1% of the US housing stock, based on historical grid operations and the assumption that over the heat pump's 15 years life electric grid CO2 emissions decrease by 45%.

qualified (qualify): 1 supporting (1 independent, strongest 0.5), 2 qualifying.

warning needs-qualification: RMI 2018, the economics of electrifying buildings: On 2016 short-term marginal grid data, heat pumps cut emissions versus gas in Oakland, Houston and Providence but raised them in coal-heavy Chicago (about 50% more), so the claim holds on most grids but not all. Less 2021 (LBNL), cost of decarbonization retrofits: LBNL: fuel switching boosted carbon cuts (68% vs 50%) in the electrification cluster…

  • supports Deetjen 2021, private economics of US residential heat pumps right 50%, direct Deetjen 2021, private economics of US residential heat pumps, lines 635-L642significantly. Climate benefits mostly increase with heat pump adoption: only in 1.7 million houses (2.1% of the US housing stock) does heat pump adoption increase CO2 emissions. Yet, abatement costs can be high: although 22.4 million house…
A second national study, from US national laboratories, modelled every home switching to a heat pump at once, not only gas-heated ones, and found average greenhouse gas savings positive in every state, in every future grid scenario it modelled, even the most conservative one. s25 verified

verified s25.a Wilson et al. model full, immediate ASHP adoption and find average annual GHG savings are positive in every state and in every heat pump and future grid scenario, even the conservative high renewable energy cost grid scenario.

qualified (qualify): 1 supporting (1 independent, strongest 0.6), 2 qualifying.

warning needs-qualification: RMI 2018, the economics of electrifying buildings: On 2016 short-term marginal grid data, heat pumps cut emissions versus gas in Oakland, Houston and Providence but raised them in coal-heavy Chicago (about 50% more), so the claim holds on most grids but not all. Less 2021 (LBNL), cost of decarbonization retrofits: LBNL: fuel switching boosted carbon cuts (68% vs 50%) in the electrification cluster…

  • supports Wilson 2024 (NREL and LBNL), heat pumps for all? right 60%, direct Wilson 2024 (NREL and LBNL), heat pumps for all?, lines 248-L258different heat pump scenario and each column being a different future grid sce- nario. Average annual GHG savings are positive in every state and in every heat pump and grid scenario, even in the conservative ‘‘high renewable energy cost’’ …
Notice what that measures: an average for each state on grids the authors project into the future, not today's grid, and not a count of the homes that come out behind. s26 verified

verified s26.a Wilson et al. report average annual GHG savings per household by state under different future grid scenarios.

qualified (qualify): 1 supporting (1 independent, strongest 0.6), 2 qualifying.

warning needs-qualification: RMI 2018, the economics of electrifying buildings: On 2016 short-term marginal grid data, heat pumps cut emissions versus gas in Oakland, Houston and Providence but raised them in coal-heavy Chicago (about 50% more), so the claim holds on most grids but not all. Less 2021 (LBNL), cost of decarbonization retrofits: LBNL: fuel switching boosted carbon cuts (68% vs 50%) in the electrification cluster…

  • supports Wilson 2024 (NREL and LBNL), heat pumps for all? right 60%, direct Wilson 2024 (NREL and LBNL), heat pumps for all?, lines 248-L258different heat pump scenario and each column being a different future grid sce- nario. Average annual GHG savings are positive in every state and in every heat pump and grid scenario, even in the conservative ‘‘high renewable energy cost’’ …
The cleaner the grid, the bigger the gain.
In a Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory study of home retrofits, the group of projects built around electrification, with solar panels, sat mostly in states with low-carbon electricity, and there switching fuels sharply boosted their carbon savings. s16 verified

verified s16.a In LBNL's retrofit study, projects in the Electrification with PV cluster tended to be located in states with low carbon intensity of grid electricity, and fuel switching dramatically boosted carbon reductions in that cluster.

qualified (qualify): no direct support, 2 qualifying.

warning needs-qualification: Less 2021 (LBNL), cost of decarbonization retrofits: LBNL: fuel switching boosted carbon cuts (68% vs 50%) in the electrification cluster, but those projects were mostly in states with low-carbon grids, and the authors expect lower carbon savings where electricity is more carbon-intensive. Add the qualification: the evidence supports a narrower or weaker statement.

  • qualifies Less 2021 (LBNL), cost of decarbonization retrofits partly 35%, direct Less 2021 (LBNL), cost of decarbonization retrofits, lines 1947-L1952Second, projects in the Electrification with PV cluster focused on electrification as a core upgrade strategy. These projects tended to be located in states that have low carbon intensity of grid electricity (see APPENDIX B – Energy Unit Co…
The authors expect similar projects to save less carbon in states whose electricity is more carbon-intensive. s17 verified

verified s17.a LBNL's authors expect similar electrification projects to have lower carbon savings in states with higher carbon intensity in their electricity.

qualified (qualify): no direct support, 2 qualifying.

warning needs-qualification: Less 2021 (LBNL), cost of decarbonization retrofits: LBNL: fuel switching boosted carbon cuts (68% vs 50%) in the electrification cluster, but those projects were mostly in states with low-carbon grids, and the authors expect lower carbon savings where electricity is more carbon-intensive. Add the qualification: the evidence supports a narrower or weaker statement.

  • qualifies Less 2021 (LBNL), cost of decarbonization retrofits partly 35%, direct Less 2021 (LBNL), cost of decarbonization retrofits, lines 1947-L1952Second, projects in the Electrification with PV cluster focused on electrification as a core upgrade strategy. These projects tended to be located in states that have low carbon intensity of grid electricity (see APPENDIX B – Energy Unit Co…

Answer

So does swapping gas for a heat pump cut emissions on today's grid? In the British homes, yes, by about a third of their energy footprint, and in RMI's words it already cuts carbon on today's grid in all but the most coal-heavy systems, though that was the grid when RMI wrote it. s18 verified

verified s18.a In today's terms, British households that replaced a gas boiler with a heat pump cut the CO2eq footprint of their energy use by about a third (36%).

qualified (qualify): 1 supporting (1 independent, strongest 0.65), 2 qualifying.

warning needs-qualification: RMI 2018, the economics of electrifying buildings: On 2016 short-term marginal grid data, heat pumps cut emissions versus gas in Oakland, Houston and Providence but raised them in coal-heavy Chicago (about 50% more), so the claim holds on most grids but not all. Less 2021 (LBNL), cost of decarbonization retrofits: LBNL: fuel switching boosted carbon cuts (68% vs 50%) in the electrification cluster…

  • supports Bernard 2024 (NBER), UK heat pumps and a time-of-use tariff right 65%, direct Bernard 2024 (NBER), UK heat pumps and a time-of-use tariff, lines 193-L198today’s terms, that is equivalent to a 1.16 tonne reduction in CO2eq emissions per household per year – we calculate that this is a 36% reduction on their pre-heat-pump adoption CO2eq foot- print from annual energy consumption of 3.23 tonne…

verified s18.b RMI states that electrification already reduces carbon with today's electric grid in all but the most coal-heavy systems, compared with natural gas as well as oil and propane.

qualified (qualify): no direct support, 2 qualifying.

warning needs-qualification: RMI 2018, the economics of electrifying buildings: On 2016 short-term marginal grid data, heat pumps cut emissions versus gas in Oakland, Houston and Providence but raised them in coal-heavy Chicago (about 50% more), so the claim holds on most grids but not all. "all" is stronger than the evidence (strongest support 0). Add the qualification: the evidence supports a narrower or weaker statement.

  • qualifies RMI 2018, the economics of electrifying buildings partly 50%, direct RMI 2018, the economics of electrifying buildings, lines 225-L231Electrification already reduces carbon with today’s electric grid in all but the most coal-heavy systems. This is true in comparison to not only heating oil and propane, but also to natural gas. Figure 3 illustrates this result, showing emi…
The exception is a grid like Chicago's. s19 verified

verified s19.a RMI found the short-term impact of electrification increases carbon emissions in Chicago, whose grid has coal as its marginal generator most of the year.

qualified (qualify): no direct support, 2 qualifying.

warning needs-qualification: RMI 2018, the economics of electrifying buildings: On 2016 short-term marginal grid data, heat pumps cut emissions versus gas in Oakland, Houston and Providence but raised them in coal-heavy Chicago (about 50% more), so the claim holds on most grids but not all. Add the qualification: the evidence supports a narrower or weaker statement.

  • qualifies RMI 2018, the economics of electrifying buildings partly 50%, direct RMI 2018, the economics of electrifying buildings, lines 225-L231Electrification already reduces carbon with today’s electric grid in all but the most coal-heavy systems. This is true in comparison to not only heating oil and propane, but also to natural gas. Figure 3 illustrates this result, showing emi…
How rare that exception is, the evidence can only estimate: the national American studies both build in a grid that gets cleaner, so neither is a reading of today's grid alone. s20 verified

verified s20.a Deetjen et al. base their estimate on the assumption that electric grid CO2 emissions decrease over the heat pump's life.

qualified (qualify): 1 supporting (1 independent, strongest 0.5), 2 qualifying.

warning needs-qualification: RMI 2018, the economics of electrifying buildings: On 2016 short-term marginal grid data, heat pumps cut emissions versus gas in Oakland, Houston and Providence but raised them in coal-heavy Chicago (about 50% more), so the claim holds on most grids but not all. Less 2021 (LBNL), cost of decarbonization retrofits: LBNL: fuel switching boosted carbon cuts (68% vs 50%) in the electrification cluster…

  • supports Deetjen 2021, private economics of US residential heat pumps right 50%, direct Deetjen 2021, private economics of US residential heat pumps, lines 635-L642significantly. Climate benefits mostly increase with heat pump adoption: only in 1.7 million houses (2.1% of the US housing stock) does heat pump adoption increase CO2 emissions. Yet, abatement costs can be high: although 22.4 million house…

verified s20.b Wilson et al. estimate savings under future grid scenarios.

qualified (qualify): 1 supporting (1 independent, strongest 0.6), 2 qualifying.

warning needs-qualification: RMI 2018, the economics of electrifying buildings: On 2016 short-term marginal grid data, heat pumps cut emissions versus gas in Oakland, Houston and Providence but raised them in coal-heavy Chicago (about 50% more), so the claim holds on most grids but not all. Less 2021 (LBNL), cost of decarbonization retrofits: LBNL: fuel switching boosted carbon cuts (68% vs 50%) in the electrification cluster…

  • supports Wilson 2024 (NREL and LBNL), heat pumps for all? right 60%, direct Wilson 2024 (NREL and LBNL), heat pumps for all?, lines 248-L258different heat pump scenario and each column being a different future grid sce- nario. Average annual GHG savings are positive in every state and in every heat pump and grid scenario, even in the conservative ‘‘high renewable energy cost’’ …

Takeaway

If carbon is why you are looking at a heat pump, the question to put to your power company is not whether it burns anything, but what it burns when demand rises, and whether that is changing. Know that, and you know the part of the answer these studies turn on.

16 scenes, 4:53 at 150 words per minute including pauses. Narration is copied from the script; every chart value and on-screen citation is checked against a passage.

1. sc01 · 0:00 to 0:12 typography

If the electricity that runs a heat pump comes from a gas or coal power plant, is the heat pump really any cleaner than the gas furnace it replaced?

Visual. The question types on, large and centred; "cleaner" turns green as the sentence ends.

On screen. Is a heat pump really cleaner than gas?

2. sc02 · 0:12 to 0:17 transition

It is a fair question, so let's put it to the studies.

Visual. Split field wipes the question away to an empty field ready for the first quote.

3. sc03 · 0:17 to 0:37 typography

The doubters are easy to find: one letter to the Boston Globe warned that "the majority of electricity in Massachusetts is sourced from gas- and coal-fired power plants", and the American Gas Association argues that a gas home can have a smaller carbon footprint than a heat pump home.

Visual. Quote card, text only; "gas- and coal-fired" holds and turns amber.

On screen. "the majority of electricity in Massachusetts is sourced from gas- and coal-fired power plants"

Cite. Letter to the Boston GlobeAmerican Gas Association

4. sc04 · 0:37 to 0:49 typography

The channel Technology Connections answers that even with a gas-fired power plant behind it, "a heat pump can move more heat energy into a living space than the natural gas itself contains".

Visual. Quote card, text only, mirrored from the previous one; "more heat energy" turns green as it is spoken.

On screen. "a heat pump can move more heat energy into a living space than the natural gas itself contains"

Cite. Technology Connections, YouTube

5. sc05 · 0:49 to 0:54 typography

So which is it, in real homes, on real grids?

Visual. The question types on centred; "real grids" holds in amber.

On screen. Which is it, on real grids?

6. sc06 · 0:54 to 1:32 data-chart

Start in Britain, with households that replaced a gas boiler with a heat pump. A working paper turned the change in those households' energy use into emissions and found, in today's terms, a cut of 1.16 tonnes of CO2 equivalent per household per year: 36 percent of the footprint their energy use had before the heat pump. The authors also assume the electricity grid keeps getting cleaner, and on that assumption project a 68 percent cut across an assumed 20-year working life: a lifetime projection, not today's figure.

Visual. Two horizontal bars. The 36% bar grows on "36 percent" in solid green; the 68% bar grows on "68 percent" in a lighter hatched tone, labelled as a projection.

Today36%36percentBernard 2024 (NBER), UK heat pumps and a time-of-use tariff, lines 193-L198
Projected over 20-year life68%68percentBernard 2024 (NBER), UK heat pumps and a time-of-use tariff, lines 193-L198

Cite. NBER working paper, UK heat pump households

7. sc07 · 1:32 to 1:37 typography

But not every grid is Britain's. What happens where coal still runs the show?

Visual. The question types on; "coal" turns dark grey.

On screen. What happens where coal still runs the show?

8. sc08 · 1:37 to 2:07 document-excerpt

A report from RMI compared electric heating with gas in American cities on the grid of the time, and found it cut carbon in Oakland, Houston and Providence. But in Chicago, where coal is the power that answers extra demand most of the year, electrifying heat increased carbon emissions in the short term. RMI expected that to swing in favour of electrification, in Chicago and nationally, as coal plants keep retiring.

Visual. The RMI passage on a page; the city names read in order, then the Chicago line highlights in amber as s11 is spoken.

Cite. RMI, The Economics of Electrifying Buildings, 2018

9. sc09 · 2:07 to 2:32 typography

The Canadian Climate Institute, citing the International Energy Agency and a consulting firm, says that even on relatively emissions-intensive electricity, heat pumps emit 20 to 30 percent less carbon than gas furnaces, because they are so efficient. That is a summary of other work, not a measurement on any one grid, so it sits beside RMI's Chicago result rather than overturning it.

Visual. Title card; "20 to 30%" in green, large, "less carbon than gas furnaces" beneath.

On screen. 20 to 30% less carbon than gas furnaces

Cite. Canadian Climate Institute, 2023, citing IEA

10. sc10 · 2:32 to 2:37 typography

So how many American homes sit on the wrong side of that line?

Visual. The question types on centred.

On screen. How many homes sit on the wrong side?

11. sc11 · 2:37 to 2:58 data-chart

One national model found switching to a heat pump would raise CO2 emissions in just 2.1 percent of the US housing stock, a share of all houses rather than of gas homes alone, but that estimate assumes grid CO2 emissions fall 45 percent over the heat pump's 15-year life.

Visual. Three tiles in a row: 2.1% lands first on "2.1 percent"; 45% and 15 years land together on "45 percent", in amber as assumptions.

Houses where emissions rise2.1%2.1percentDeetjen 2021, private economics of US residential heat pumps, lines 635-L642
Assumed fall in grid CO245%45percentDeetjen 2021, private economics of US residential heat pumps, lines 635-L642
Heat pump life15 years15countDeetjen 2021, private economics of US residential heat pumps, lines 635-L642

Cite. Deetjen et al., 2021, US housing stock model

12. sc12 · 2:58 to 3:29 document-excerpt

A second national study, from US national laboratories, modelled every home switching to a heat pump at once, not only gas-heated ones, and found average greenhouse gas savings positive in every state, in every future grid scenario it modelled, even the most conservative one. Notice what that measures: an average for each state on grids the authors project into the future, not today's grid, and not a count of the homes that come out behind.

Visual. The passage on a page; the savings sentence highlights green on s25; on s26 "future grid" is underlined.

Cite. Wilson et al., 2024, US national laboratories

13. sc13 · 3:29 to 3:32 typography

The cleaner the grid, the bigger the gain.

Visual. Title card; "cleaner" and "bigger" in green.

On screen. The cleaner the grid, the bigger the gain

14. sc14 · 3:32 to 3:54 document-excerpt

In a Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory study of home retrofits, the group of projects built around electrification, with solar panels, sat mostly in states with low-carbon electricity, and there switching fuels sharply boosted their carbon savings. The authors expect similar projects to save less carbon in states whose electricity is more carbon-intensive.

Visual. The LBNL passage on a page; the fuel-switching line highlights green on s16.

Cite. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 2021, retrofit study

15. sc15 · 3:54 to 4:31 typography

So does swapping gas for a heat pump cut emissions on today's grid? In the British homes, yes, by about a third of their energy footprint, and in RMI's words it already cuts carbon on today's grid in all but the most coal-heavy systems, though that was the grid when RMI wrote it. The exception is a grid like Chicago's. How rare that exception is, the evidence can only estimate: the national American studies both build in a grid that gets cleaner, so neither is a reading of today's grid alone.

Visual. List builds one line per sentence: Britain in green, the Chicago exception in amber, the estimate caveat in grey.

On screen. British homes: about a third less / The exception: a grid like Chicago's / How rare: only estimated

Cite. NBER working paper, UK householdsRMI, 2018

16. sc16 · 4:31 to 4:53 typography

If carbon is why you are looking at a heat pump, the question to put to your power company is not whether it burns anything, but what it burns when demand rises, and whether that is changing. Know that, and you know the part of the answer these studies turn on.

Visual. The question types on centred; "when demand rises" in amber.

On screen. What does it burn when demand rises?